Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS 7HFE9R0x. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Background Given the growing availability of multilevel data from national surveys, researchers interested in contextual effects may find themselves with a small number of individuals per group. Although there is a growing body of literature on sample size in multilevel modelling, few have explored the impact of group sizes of less than five. Methods In a simulated analysis of real data, the impact of a group size of less than five was examined on both a continuous and dichotomous outcome in a simple two-level multilevel model. Models with group sizes one to five were compared with models with complete data. Four different linear and logistic models were examined : empty models ; models with a group-level covariate ; models with an individual-level covariate and models with an aggregated group-level covariate. The study evaluated further whether the impact of small group size differed depending on the total number of groups. Results When the number of groups was large (N=459), neither fixed nor random components were affected by small group size, even when 90% of tracts had only one individual per tract and even when an aggregated group-level covariate was examined. As the number of groups decreased, the SE estimates of both fixed and random effects were inflated. Furthermore, group-level variance estimates were more affected than were fixed components. Conclusions Datasets in which there is a small to moderate number of groups, with the majority of very small group size (n
|