Titre : | Manufacturing uncertainty : Contested science and the protection of the Public's health and environment. (2005) |
Auteurs : | David MICHAELS ; Celeste MONFORTON ; George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health. Washington. DC. USA |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | American journal of public health (vol. 95, 2005) |
Pagination : | S39-S48 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Mots-clés : | Sciences ; Protection ; Santé environnementale ; Expertise |
Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS pR0x4qeF. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Opponents of public health and environmental regulations often try to "manufacture uncertainty" by questioning the validity of scientific evidence on which the regulations are based. Though most identified with the tobacco industry, this strategy has also been used by producers of other hazardous products. Its proponents use the label "junk science" to ridicule research that threatens powerful interests. This strategy of manufacturing uncertainty is antithetical to the public health principle that decisions be made using the best evidence available. The public health system must ensure that scientific evidence is evaluated in a manner that assures the public's health and environment will be adequately protected. |