Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS R0xQ5viH. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Background Military fatalities occur in clusters, and causes differ between theatres of operation or within-theatre over time. Aim Based on around 500 coalition deaths, identify major causes in Iraq and Afghanistan. For consecutive periods (1 : May 1 to September 17,2006,2 : September 18,2006 to February 4,2007), ascertain UK and others'numbers deployed to compare fatality rates per 1000-personnel years. Take account of clustering : deaths per fatal improvised explosive device (IED) incident, and in making short-term projections for Afghanistan. Methods Cause and date of coalition deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan are as listed in http :/www. iCasualties. org, where each death is designated as hostile or non-hostile. Numbers deployed in 2006 were available for UK and Canada, and for US to Iraq. Findings Out of 537 coalition fatalities in Iraq in 2006 to September 17,2006,457 (85%) were hostile, but only half were in Afghanistan (October 2001 to September 17,2006 : 52%, 249/478). Air losses accounted for 5% fatalities in Iraq, but 32% in Afghanistan. IEDs claimed three out of five hostile deaths in Iraq, only a quarter in Afghanistan. Deaths per fatal IED incident averaged 1.5. In period 1,50/117 military deaths in Afghanistan were UK or Canadian from 6750 personnel, a fatality rate of 19/1000/year, nearly four times the US rate of 5/1000/year in Iraq (based on 280 deaths). Sixty out of 117 fatalities in Afghanistan occurred as clusters of two or more deaths. In period 2, fatality rates changed : down by two-thirds in Afghanistan for UK and Canadian forces to 6/1000/year (18 deaths), up by 46% for US troops in Iraq to 7.5/1000/year (416 deaths). Interpretation Rate, and cause, of military fatalities are capable of abrupt change, as happened in Iraq (rate) and Afghanistan (rate and cause) between consecutive 140-day periods. Forecasts can be wide of the mark.
|