Titre :
|
Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance. (1998)
|
Auteurs :
|
D.C. ARON ;
D.L. HARPER ;
G.E. ROSENTHAL ;
L.B. SHEPARDSON ;
Division of General Internal Medicine. Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Care Research. Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Case Western Reserve University. USA
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
JAMA - Journal of the american medical association (vol. 279, n° 24, 1998)
|
Pagination :
|
1968-1972
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Césarienne
;
Examen clinique
;
Méthodologie
;
Facteur risque
;
Evaluation
;
Femme
;
Homme
;
Etats Unis
;
Amérique du Nord
;
Amérique
;
Chirurgie
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST oOkl2R0x. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Context. - Hospitals and health plans are often ranked on rates of cesarean delivery, under the assumption that lower rates reflect more appropriate, more efficient care. However, most rankings do not account for patient factors that affect the likelihood of cesarean delivery. Objective. - To compare hospital cesarean delivery rates before and after adjusting for clinical risk factors that increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery. Design. - Retrospective cohort study. Setting. - Twenty-one hospitals in northeast Ohio. Patients. - A total of 26127 women without prior cesarean deliveries admitted for labor and delivery from January 1993 through June 1995. Main Outcome Measures. - Hospital rankings based on observed and risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. Results. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 15.9% and varied (P<. from to in individual hospitals. adjusted rates varied the correlation between unadjusted and hospital rankings was only modest p="12)." whereas hospitals were classified as outliers had higher or lower than overall rate on basis of both outlier status changed for including that nonoutliers nonout-liers a high low outlier.>
|