| Titre : | Does advocacy work? : A qualitative study exploring the perceived impact of advocacy work |
| Auteurs : | Nesrine Ahmed Ali ; Ecole des hautes études en santé publique (EHESP) (Rennes, FRA) |
| Type de document : | Mémoire |
| Année de publication : | 2024 |
| Description : | 44p. / fig. |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Classement : | MPH/ (Mémoires MPH à partir de 2024) |
| Mots-clés : | Plaidoyer ; Groupe pression ; Influence ; Action humanitaire ; Médecine humanitaire ; Médecins sans frontières ; ONG ; Politique santé |
| Résumé : | The study concludes that while advocacy work is perceived as impactful for driving change in health policy, it can also lead to mixed feelings and frustration within NGOs due to internal friction and challenges. These challenges are on two levels, one for assessing the impact of advocacy work, and another one because of the diversity of opinion on advocacy work. can be alleviated by creating a unified organizational identity, clearly defining roles and tasks, creating a monitoring and evaluation system, and balance between grassroots and advocacy work. These challenges should be addressed before NGOs implement advocacy work to be informed about their impact and guided toward impactful advocacy work. (R.A.) |
| Diplôme : | Master MPH of public health |
| Plan de classement simplifié : | Master of Public Health - master international de Santé Publique (MPH) |
| En ligne : | https://documentation.ehesp.fr/memoires/2024/mph/nesrine_ahmed_ali.pdf |
Documents numériques (1)
 Full text URL |