| Titre : | Clinical guidelines for chronic conditions in the European Union |
| Auteurs : | Helena Legido-Quigley ; Dimitra Panteli ; Josip Car ; et al. ; Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS). Bureau Régional de l'Europe (Copenhague, DNK) ; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (Brussels, BEL) ; Observatoire Européen des Systèmes et des Politiques de Santé (Bruxelles, BEL) |
| Type de document : | Ouvrage |
| Editeur : | Bruxelles [BEL] : Observatoire Européen des Systèmes et politiques de Santé, 2013 |
| Collection : | Observatory Studies Series , num. 30 |
| ISBN : | 978-92-890-0021-5 |
| Description : | XXXI+2156p. |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Prévention santé ; Méthodologie ; Réglementation ; Evaluation ; Pratique médicale ; Acteur ; Diabète ; Qualité ; Définition ; Synthèse connaissance ; Contrôle qualité ; Concept ; Recommandation ; Maladie chronique ; Etude cas ; Innovation ; Agence sanitaire ; Médecine fondée sur les preuves ; Revue de littérature |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par IRDES DR0xtAB7. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Chronic noncommunicable diseases make up a large part of the burden of disease and make a huge call on health systems'resources. Clinical guidelines are one of the ways European countries have tried to respond and to ensure a long-term perspective in managing them and addressing their determinants. This book explores those guidelines and whether they actually affect processes of care and patients'health outcomes. It analyses : the regulatory basis, the actors involved and processes used in developing clinical guidelines across Europe ; innovative methods for cost-effective prevention of common risk factors, developing coordinated patient-centred care and stimulating integrated research ; the strategies used to disseminate and implement clinical guidelines in various contexts ; and the effectiveness of their utilization. This study reviews for the first time the various national practices relating to clinical guidelines in 29 European countries (the European Union (EU), Norway and Switzerland). It shows that, while some have made impressive progress, many are still relying on sporadic and unclear processes. The level of sophistication, quality and transparency of guideline development varies substantially across the region, even when the system for producing guidelines is well established. There are nevertheless clear examples that - if shared - can assure and improve quality of care across Europe. |
| En ligne : | http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/chronic-respiratory-diseases/publications/2013/clinical-guidelines-for-chronic-conditions-in-the-european-union |
Documents numériques (1)
 Texte integral URL |