| Titre : | Cigarette prices, smoking, and the poor : Implications of recent trends. (2007) |
| Auteurs : | Peter FRANKS ; Alan CHIEM ; JERANT (Anthony-F) : USA. Department of Family and Community Medicine. School of Medicine. University of California. Davis. ; Dennis LEE ; Sandy LEE ; Jpaul LEIGH ; Ilene LEWIS ; Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care. School of Medicine. University of California. Davis. USA ; University of California. Davis. USA |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of public health (vol. 97, n° 10, 2007) |
| Pagination : | 1873-1877 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Tabagisme ; Prix ; Tendance séculaire ; Cigarette ; Homme |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS R0xGk7Ar. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objective. We examined the relationship between smoking participation and cigarette pack price by income group and time period to determine role of cigarette prices in income-related disparities in smoking in the United States. Methods. We used data from the 1984-2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys linked to information on cigarette prices to examine the adjusted prevalence of smoking participation and smoking participation-cigarette pack price elasticity (change in percentage of persons smoking relative to a 1% change in cigarette price) by income group (lowest income quartile [lower] vs all other quartiles [higher]) and time period (before vs after the Master Settlement Agreement [MSA]). Results. Increased real cigarette-pack price overtime was associated with a marked decline in smoking among higher-income but not among lower-income persons. Although the pre-MSA association between cigarette pack price and smoking revealed a larger elasticity in the lower-versus higher-income persons (-0.45 vs - 0.22), the post-MSA association was not statistically significant (P>. 2) for either income group. Conclusions. Despite cigarette price increases after the MSA, income-related smoking disparities have increased. Increasing cigarette prices may no longer be an effective policy tool and may impose a disproportionate burden on poor smokers. |

