| Titre : | The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research. (2010) |
| Auteurs : | STANG (Andreas) : DEU. Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie. Medizinische Fakultät. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. Halle Saale. ; KUSS (Oliver) : DEU. Institut für Medizinische Epidemiologie. Biometrie und Informatik. Universitätsklinikum Halle und Medizinische Fakultät. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. Halle Saale. ; POOLE (Charles) : USA. Department of Epidemiology. Unc Gillings School of Global Public Health. University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill. NC. |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | European journal of epidemiology (vol. 25, n° 4, 2010) |
| Pagination : | 225-230 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Statistique ; Dépistage ; Biostatistique ; Recherche médicale ; Biologie ; Intervalle confiance ; Homme ; Epidémiologie |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS 9nR0x7FG. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Since its introduction into the biomedical literature, statistical significance testing (abbreviated as SST) caused much debate. The aim of this perspective article is to review frequent fallacies and misuses of SST in the biomedical field and to review a potential way out of the fallacies and misuses associated with SSTs. Two frequentist schools of statistical inference merged to form SST as it is practised nowadays : the Fisher and the Neyman-Pearson school. The P-value is both reported quantitatively and checked against the alpha-level to produce a qualitative dichotomous measure (significant/nonsignificant). However, a P-value mixes the estimated effect size with its estimated precision. Obviously, it is not possible to measure these two things with one single number. For the valid interpretation of SSTs, a variety of presumptions and requirements have to be met. We point here to four of them : study size, correct statistical model, correct causal model, and absence of bias and confounding. It has been stated that the P-value is perhaps the most misunderstood statistical concept in clinical research. As in the social sciences, the tyranny of SST is still highly prevalent in the biomedical literature even after decades of warnings against SST. The ubiquitous misuse and tyranny of SST threatens scientific discoveries and may even impede scientific progress. In the worst case, misuse of significance testing may even harm patients who eventually are incorrectly treated because of improper handling of P-values. For a proper interpretation of study results, both estimated effect size and estimated precision are necessary ingredients. |
Service Documentation EHESP
Me connecter
PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE
École des hautes études en santé publique
Catalogue
Multi-bases
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
Service Documentation EHESPBibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis
France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact