| Titre : | Using Marginal Structural Measurement-Error Models to Estimate the Long-term Effect of Antiretroviral Therapy on Incident AIDS or Death. (2010) |
| Auteurs : | Stephen-R COLE ; Kathryn ANASTOS ; Joan-S CHMIEL ; Lisa-P JACOBSON ; Lawrence KINGSLEY ; Phyllis-C TIEN |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of epidemiology (vol. 171, n° 1, 1ère quinzaine Janvier 2010) |
| Pagination : | 113-122 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Sida ; Estimation ; Long terme ; Thérapeutique ; Médicament antirétroviral ; Traitement antirétroviral ; Médicament antiviral ; Thérapeutique médicamenteuse ; Chimiothérapie ; Incidence ; Mortalité ; Biais ; Epidémiologie ; VIH ; Critère sélection ; Virose ; Infection ; Rétrovirus ; Virus ; Immunopathologie |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS R0xH9kq9. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. To estimate the net effect of imperfectly measured highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death, the authors combined inverse probability-of-treatment-and-censoring weighted estimation of a marginal structural Cox model with regression-calibration methods. Between 1995 and 2007,950 human immunodeficiency virus-positive men and women were followed in 2 US cohort studies. During 4,054 person-years, 374 initiated highly active antiretroviral therapy, 211 developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or died, and 173 dropped out. Accounting for measured confounders and determinants of dropout, the weighted hazard ratio for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death comparing use of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the prior 2 years with no therapy was 0.36 (95% confidence limits : 0.21,0.61). This association was relatively constant over follow-up (P=0.19) and stronger than crude or adjusted hazard ratios of 0.75 and 0.95, respectively. Accounting for measurement error in reported exposure using external validation data on 331 men and women provided a hazard ratio of 0.17, with bias shifted from the hazard ratio to the estimate of precision as seen by the 2.5-fold wider confidence limits (95% confidence limits : 0.06,0.43). Marginal structural measurement-error models can simultaneously account for 3 major sources of bias in epidemiologic research : validated exposure measurement error, measured selection bias, and measured time-fixed and time-varying confounding. |
Service Documentation EHESP
Me connecter
PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE
École des hautes études en santé publique
Catalogue
Multi-bases
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
Service Documentation EHESPBibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis
France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact