| Titre : | A major state tobacco tax increase, the master settlement agreement, and cigarette consumption : The California experience. (2005) |
| Auteurs : | Hai-Yen SUNG ; Teh-Wei HU ; Theodore-E KEELER ; Michael Ong ; Mei-Ling SHEU |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of public health (vol. 95, n° 6, 2005) |
| Pagination : | 1030-1035 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Tabagisme ; Tabac ; Augmentation ; Cigarette ; Taxe consommation ; Consommation tabac ; Consommation ; Etats Unis ; Amérique ; Prix ; Amérique du Nord |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS P04R0xMG. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. OBJECTIVES : We evaluated the combined effects on California cigarette consumption of an additional 50 cent per pack state tax imposed by Proposition 10 of January 1999 and a 45 cent per pack increase in cigarette prices stemming from the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) of November 1998. METHODS : We used quarterly cigarette sales data for the period 1984-2002 to estimate a time-series intervention model adjusting for seasonal variations and time trend. RESULTS : Over the period 1999 through 2002, the combined effect was to reduce cigarette consumption by 2.4 packs per capita per quarter (1.3 billion packs total over the 4-year period) and to raise state tax revenues by $2.1 billion. These effects were similar to the effects of a 25 cent per pack tax increase enacted by Proposition 99 a decade earlier, although with decreased relative effectiveness as measured by percentage of reduction in cigarette consumption divided by percentage of increase in taxation (-0.44 vs - 0.60). CONCLUSIONS : A major increase in price through taxation and the MSA provided a strong economic disincentive for smokers in a state with a low smoking prevalence. This effect could be reinforced if part of the MSA payments were devoted to tobacco control programs. |

