Titre :
|
Questioning the Consensus : Managing Carrier Status Results Generated by Newborn Screening. (2009)
|
Auteurs :
|
Fiona-Alice MILLER ;
Robin-Z HAYEEMS ;
Jason-Scott Robert ;
Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation. University of Toronto. Ontario. CAN
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
American journal of public health (vol. 99, n° 2, 2009)
|
Pagination :
|
210-215
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Porteur
;
Résultat
;
Nouveau né
;
Dépistage
;
Homme
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS 9GqlR0xF. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening : results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bio-ethics. However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are-in effect - required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements : to with old information or require ist possession. Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits.
|