| Titre : | Questioning the Consensus : Managing Carrier Status Results Generated by Newborn Screening. (2009) |
| Auteurs : | Fiona-Alice MILLER ; Robin-Z HAYEEMS ; Jason-Scott Robert ; Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation. University of Toronto. Ontario. CAN |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of public health (vol. 99, n° 2, 2009) |
| Pagination : | 210-215 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Porteur ; Résultat ; Nouveau né ; Dépistage ; Homme |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS 9GqlR0xF. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening : results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bio-ethics. However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are-in effect - required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements : to with old information or require ist possession. Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits. |

