| Titre : | Do urban regeneration programmes improve public health and reduce health inequalities ? A synthesis of the evidence from UK policy and practice (1980-2004). (2006) |
| Auteurs : | Hilary THOMSON ; ATKINSON (Rowland) : AUS. Housing and Community Research Unit. School of Sociology and Social Work. University of Tasmania. Hobart. ; KEARNS (Ade) : GBR. Esrc Centre for Neighbourhood Research. Department of Urban Studies. University of Glasgow. ; Mark Petticrew |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Journal of epidemiology and community health (vol. 60, n° 2, 2006) |
| Pagination : | 108-115 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Milieu urbain ; Programme santé ; Europe sociale ; Royaume Uni ; Europe ; Politique santé ; Etat santé |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS F43VR0xi. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objectives : To synthesise data on the impact on health and key socioeconomic determinants of health and health inequalities reported in evaluations of national UK regeneration programmes. Data Sources : Eight electronic databases were searched from 1980 to 2004 (IBSS, COPAC, HMIC, IDOX, INSIDE, Medline, Urbadisc/Accompline, Web of Knowledge). Bibliographies of located documents and relevant web sites were searched. Experts and government departmental libraries were also contacted. Review methods : Evaluations that reported achievements drawing on data from at least two target areas of a national urban regeneration programme in the UK were included. Process evaluations and evaluations reporting only business outcomes were excluded. All methods of evaluation were included. Impact data on direct health outcomes and direct measures of socioeconomic determinants of health were narratively synthesised. Results : 19 evaluations reported impacts on health or socioeconomic determinants of health ; data from 10 evaluations were synthesised. Three evaluations reported health impacts ; in one evaluation three of four measures of self reported health deteriorated, typically by around 4%. Two other evaluations reported overall reductions in mortality rates. Most socioeconomic outcomes assessed showed an overall improvement after regeneration investment ; however, the effect size was often similar to national trends. In addition, some evaluations reported adverse impacts. Conclusion : There is little evidence of the impact of national urban regeneration investment on socioeconomic or health outcomes. Where impacts have been assessed, these are often small and positive but adverse impacts have also occurred. Impact data from future evaluations are required to inform healthy public policy ; in the meantime work to exploit and synthesise "best available" data is required. |
Service Documentation EHESP
Me connecter
PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE
École des hautes études en santé publique
Catalogue
Multi-bases
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
Service Documentation EHESPBibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis
France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact