| Titre : | Health by association ? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Commentaries. Authors'reply. (2004) |
| Auteurs : | Simon SZRETER ; A. COUTTS, disc. ; A. ELLAWAY, disc. ; Ichiro Kawachi, disc. ; D. KIM, disc. ; J. LYNCH, disc. ; C. MUNTANER, disc. ; V. NAVARRO, disc. ; R.D. PUTNAM, disc. ; Gdavey Smith, disc. ; S.V. SUBRAMANIAN, disc. ; S. SZRETER ; Michael WOOLCOCK ; M. WOOLCOCK ; Harvard School of Public Health. Department of Society Human Development and Health. Boston. USA |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | International journal of epidemiology (vol. 33, n° 4, 2004) |
| Pagination : | 650-709 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Royaume Uni ; Europe ; 19 siècle ; Economie santé ; Politique |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS XRKAR0xU. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Three perspectives on the efficacy of social capital have been explored in the public health literature. A'social support'perspective argues that informal networks are central to objective and subjective welfare ; an'inequality'thesis posits that widening economic disparities have eroded citizens'sense of social justice and inclusion, which in turn has led to heightened anxiety and compromised rising life expectancies ; a'political economy'approach sees the primary determinant of poor health outcomes as the socially and politically mediated exclusion from material resources. A more comprehensive but grounded theory of social capital is presented that develops a distinction between bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. It is argued that this framework helps to reconcile these three perspectives, incorporating a broader reading of history, politics, and the empirical evidence regarding the mechanisms connecting types of network structure and state-society relations to public health outcomes. |

