| Titre : | Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Number and size of randomized trials reported in general health care journals from 1948 to 1997. (2002) |
| Auteurs : | Steve MCDONALD ; Mike CLARKE ; George DAVEY SMITH, préf. ; Shah EBRAHIM, préf. ; Matthias EGGER, préf. ; Carol Lefebvre ; Margaret WESTBY ; Cochrane Centres'Working Group on 50 Years of Randomized Trials. INC ; Uk Cochrane Centre. Nhs Research & Development Programme. Oxford. GBR |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | International journal of epidemiology (vol. 31, n° 1, 2002) |
| Pagination : | 125-127 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Randomisation ; Epidémiologie ; Evolution ; Homme |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS gYR0x3V8. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Background Randomized trials are important for controlling selection biases, and where sufficient numbers of participants are involved, have the potential to yield reliable estimates of treatment effects. Methods We investigated trends in the number and size of randomized trials reported in general health care journals from 1948 to 1997. From the handsearching of 18 general health care journals we collected data on the number of reports of randomized trials in each journal per year, and the number of participants in each trial. Results A total of 5503 reports of trials were identified in 18 general health care journals. More than a third appeared in the British Medical Journal. The peak period for trial reports was the mid 1980s, with more in 1986 than any other year (242). By the mid 1990s the number per year had declined by a third. Trials with fewer than 100 participants accounted for most of the reports (69%). In spite of the overall decline in the number of trial reports, those involving 100 participants or more continued to increase throughout the period studied. Conclusions The continued increase in the number of larger trials reported is encouraging, especially if it represents an increase in the size of trials more generally. Further research is needed to determine whether the trends over time identified here are reflective more of trends in the actual conduct of, rather than simply the reporting, of randomized trials. |
Service Documentation EHESP
Me connecter
PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE
École des hautes études en santé publique
Catalogue
Multi-bases
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
Service Documentation EHESPBibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis
France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact