Titre :
|
The effects of a health promotion-health protection intervention on behavior change : The wellworks study. (1998)
|
Auteurs :
|
G. SORENSEN ;
J.S. AVRUNIN ;
S.K. HAMMOND ;
J.R. HEBERT ;
J. HIMMELSTEIN ;
M.K. HUNT ;
J.K. OCKENE ;
A. STODDARD ;
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health. Boston. MA. USA ;
University of Massachusetts Medical School. Worcester. USA ;
University of Massachusetts School of Public Health and Health Sciences. Amherst. USA
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
American journal of public health (vol. 88, n° 11, 1998)
|
Pagination :
|
1685-1690
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Promotion santé
;
Tabagisme
;
Régime alimentaire
;
Facteur risque
;
Cancer
;
Appareil circulatoire [pathologie]
;
Prévention santé
;
Homme
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST M10R0xkW. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objectives. This study assessed the effects of a 2-year integrated health promotion-health protection work-site intervention on changes in dietary habits and cigarette smoking. Methods. A randomized, controlled intervention study used the work site as the unit of intervention and analysis ; it included 24 predominantly manufacturing work sites in Massachusetts (250-2500 workers per site). Behaviors were assessed in self-administered surveys (n=2386 ; completion rates=61% at baseline, 62% at final). Three key intervention elements targeted health behavior change : (1) joint worker-management participation in program planning and implementation, (2) consultation with management on work-site environmental changes, and (3) health education programs. Results. Significant differences between intervention and control work sites included reductions in the percentafes of calories consumed as fat (2.3% vs 1.5% kcal) and increases in servings of fruit and vegetables (10% vs 4% increase). The intervention had a significant effect on fiber consumption among skilled and unskilled laborers. No significant effects were observed for smoking cessation. Conclusions. Although the size of the effects of this intervention are modest, on a populationwide basis effects of this size could have a large impact on cancer-related and coronary heart disease end points.
|