Titre :
|
Are physicians'office Laboratory results of comparable quality to those produced in other Laboratory settings ? (1998)
|
Auteurs :
|
J. HURST ;
L.H. HILBORNE ;
K. NICKEL ;
Laboratory Field Services. California Department of Health Services. Berkeley. USA
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
JAMA - Journal of the american medical association (vol. 279, n° 6, 1998)
|
Pagination :
|
468-471
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Laboratoire
;
Clinique privée
;
Etude comparée
;
Médecin
;
Responsabilité professionnelle
;
Homme
;
Economie santé
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST y8vmR0x4. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Context-ln 1995, California adopted a bill that brought laboratory laws in line with the 1988 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments'standards for clinical laboratories and mandated a study comparing results in physicians'office laboratories (POLs) with other settings. Objective-To determine whether persons conducting tests in POLs produce accurate and reliable test results comparable to those produced by non-POLs. Deslgn-Survey of clinical laboratories using proficiency testing data. Setting. - All California clinical laboratories participating in the American Association of Bioanalysts proficiency testing program in 1996 (n=11 10). Main Outcome Measures. - "Unsatisfactory" (single testing event failure) and "unsuccessful" (repeated testing event failure) on proficiency testing samples. Results. The unsatisfactory failure rate for POLs was nearly 3 times (21.5% vs 8.1%) the rate for the non-POLs and about 1.5 times (21.5% vs 14.0%) for POLs that used laboratory professionals as testing or supervisory personnel (P<. 001). The POL unsuccessful rate was more than 4 times (4.4% vs 0.9%) the rate for non-POLs and more than twice (4.4% vs 1.8%) the rate for the POLs using laboratory professionals (P<. 001). Conclusions. Significant differences exist among POLs, POLs using licensed clinical laboratory scientists (medical technologists), and non-POLs. (...)
|