Why don't we see more translation of health promot... Catalogue en ligne

Titre :	Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice ? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. (2003)
Auteurs :	Russell-E GLASGOW ; LICHTENSTEIN (Edward) : USA. Oregon Research Institute. Eugene. ; Alfred-C MARCUS ; Kaiser Permanente Colorado and Amc Cancer Research Center. Denver. USA
Type de document :	Article
Dans :	American journal of public health (vol. 93, n° 8, 2003)
Pagination :	1261-1267
Langues:	Anglais
Mots-clés :	Promotion santé ; Recherche ; Homme ; Evaluation
Résumé :	[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS 5lj4R0xU. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. The gap between research and practice is well documented. We address one of the underlying reasons for this gap : the assumption that effectiveness research naturally and logically follows from successful efficacy research. These 2 research traditions have evolved different methods and values ; consequently, these are inherent differences between the characteristics of a successful efficacy intervention versus those of an effectiveness one. Moderating factors that limit robustness across settings, populations, and intervention staff need to be addressed in efficacy studies, as well as in effectiveness trials. Greater attention needs to be paid to documenting intervention reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Recommendations are offered to help close the gap between efficacy and effectiveness research and to guide evaluation and possible adoption of new programs.

PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE