| Titre : | The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals : a patients'and physicians'perspective. (2004) |
| Auteurs : | Titia VAN KLEFFENS ; Berna VAN BAARSEN ; Evert VAN LEEUWEN ; Vu University Medical Center. Department of Philosophy and Medical Ethics. BT Amsterdam. NLD |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Social science and medicine (vol. 58, n° 11, 2004) |
| Pagination : | 2325-2336 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | Cancer ; Cancérologie ; Homme ; Autonomie ; Thérapeutique ; Décision médicale ; Médecin ; Profession santé ; Essai thérapeutique ; Refus soins ; Soins ; Consentement soins ; Ethique |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS o5cR0x17. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. The idea that patients should take up an autonomous position in the decision-making process is generally appreciated. However, what patient autonomy means in the case of patients who refuse a recommended oncological treatment has not been investigated. This study aims to clarify how the concept of patient autonomy can be applied to patients who refuse a recommended oncological treatment. Focus questions are : (1) what is meant by patient autonomy, i.e. how is this autonomy conceptualised and (2) which factors influence patient autonomy. A qualitative study design with in-depth interviews was performed. The study sample included 30 cancer patients and 16 physicians. All patients had refused a recommended oncological treatment. Patient autonomy was revealed to be a comprehensive concept with elaborations on'making decisions'and'defining life choices'as sub-concepts of patient autonomy. In contrast to what is generally believed, decisions of patients to refuse an oncological treatment do not so much rely on the medical information about disease and treatment options, but are rather inspired by patients'own experiences or those of close others. The medical information and the role of the physician do, however, influence patients'experiences of being free and/or of having a choice. The results show that the extent of pressure physicians will exert to persuade the patient to be treated as recommended depends on the medical distinction between a curative and a non-curative treatment goal. It seems that there exists a shift in respecting patient autonomy, which depends on factors like treatment goal. Discussing the respect shift may serve to clarify underlying thoughts and principles in the decision-making process for both physicians and patients. |
Service Documentation EHESP
Me connecter
PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE
École des hautes études en santé publique
Catalogue
Multi-bases
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
Service Documentation EHESPBibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis
France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact