Titre :
|
Inter-rater agreement in defining chemical incidents at the National Poisons Information Service, London. (2004)
|
Auteurs :
|
I. ABUBAKAR ;
N. EDWARDS ;
N. HERRIOTT ;
G.S. LEONARDI ;
Guy's and St Thomas'Nhs Hospital Trust. Chemical Incident Response Service. London. GBR
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
Journal of epidemiology and community health (vol. 58, n° 8, 2004)
|
Pagination :
|
718-722
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Toxique
;
Information
;
Royaume Uni
;
Europe
;
Centre antipoison
;
Enquête
;
Connaissance
;
Risque
;
Produit chimique
;
Formation médicale continue
;
Formation continue
;
Expérience professionnelle
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS X4o4rR0x. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Background : National surveillance for chemical incidents is being developed in the UK. It is important to improve the quality of information collected, standardise techniques, and train personnel. Objective : To define the extent to which eight National Poison Information Service specialists in poison information agree on the classification of calls received as "chemical incidents" based on the national definition. Design : Blinded, inter-rater reliability measured using the K statistic for multiple raters. Setting : National Poison Information Service and Chemical Incident Response Service, Guy's and St Thomas'NHS Trust, London. Participants : Eight specialists in poison information who are trained and experienced in handling poisons information calls and have been involved in extracting information for surveillance. Results : The overall level of agreement observed was at least 69% greater than expected by chance (K statistic). Fire and incidents where chemicals were released within a property had a very good level of agreement with K statistic of 83% and 80% respectively. The lowest level of agreement was observed when no one or only one person was exposed to a chemical (33%) and when the chemical was released into the air (48%). Conclusion : High levels of agreement were observed. There is a need for more training and improvement in consistency of the data collected by all organisations.
|