A-
A
A+

Service Documentation EHESP

Historique de recherche

Me connecter

PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE

École des hautes études en santé publique

Catalogue Multi-bases

Ressources documentaires en ligne

Trouver une revue

Consulter un mémoire

Consulter une thèse

Accueil

Adresse

Service Documentation EHESP
Bibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis

France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact

Nouvelle recherche

Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes : Evidence from Canadian smokers.

Ajouter à ma sélection

Ajouter à ma sélection

Lien vers la notice

Titre :	Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes : Evidence from Canadian smokers. (2004)
Auteurs :	David HAMMOND ; BROWN (Kstephen) : CAN. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science at the University of Waterloo. ; Roy CAMERON ; Geoffrey-T FONG ; Paul-W MCDONALD ; Ontario Tobacco Research Unit. CAN ; University of Waterloo. Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation. Waterloo. ON. CAN ; University of Waterloo. Department of Health Studies. Waterloo. ON. CAN ; University of Waterloo. Department of Psychology. Waterloo. ON. CAN
Type de document :	Article
Dans :	American journal of public health (vol. 94, n° 8, 2004)
Pagination :	1442-1445
Langues:	Anglais
Mots-clés :	Canada ; Amérique ; Cigarette ; Complication ; Fumeur ; Tabagisme ; Education santé ; Projet loi ; Homme ; Perception ; Amérique du Nord
Résumé :	[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS JD1cHR0x. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objectives : We assessed the impact of graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels. Methods : We used a longitudinal telephone survey of 616 adult smokers. Results : Approximately one fifth of participants reported smoking less as a result of the labels ; only 1% reported smoking more. Although participants reported negative emotional responses to the warnings including fear (44%) and disgust (58%), smokers who reported greater negative emotion were more likely to have quit, attempted to quit, or reduced their smoking 3 months later. Participants who attempted to avoid the warnings (30%) were no less likely to think about the warnings or engage in cessation behavior at follow-up. Conclusions : Policymakers should not be reluctant to introduce vivid or graphic warnings for fear of adverse outcomes.