Titre :
|
What constitutes success in preventive health care ? A case study in assessing the benefits of hip protectors. (2004)
|
Auteurs :
|
G. SALKELD ;
I.D. CAMERON ;
S. QUINCE
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
Social science and medicine (vol. 59, n° 8, 2004)
|
Pagination :
|
1593-1601
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Réussite
;
Prévention santé
;
Soins
;
Etude cas
;
Hanche
;
Qualité vie
;
Australie
;
Océanie
;
Protection
;
Chute
;
Traumatisme
;
Programme santé
;
Economie santé
;
Evaluation
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS R0xFLEkB. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. The economic success of preventive health programs is typically assessed by the net health-related utility gain or loss to society relative to the cost. Issues relating to the positive or negative utility associated with participating in a preventive health program are often ignored. However, it is likely that calls for informed consumer choice and respect for patient autonomy will provide an impetus to examine utility associated with the process and outcomes of preventive health programs. In this paper, we outline the nature of the ex ante and ex post perspective in evaluing benefits and the presence of process utility and the utility of gambling in individual's utility function for preventive health care. The implications of including process attributes and psychological states when assessing benefits to society are discussed in relation to an empirical study on the value of external hip protectors for the prevention of hip fractures. We demonstrate that wearing hip protectors and the psychological outcomes of being a participant in the program can have a significant impact on individual's assessment of the benefits. Furthermore, point of reference plays a crucial role in their valuation. Individuals who did not consent to participate in a trial of hip protectors valued all states significantly lower than those who did participate in the trial. We argue that the utility associated with adherence to the intervention is an important issue for preventive health policy. From the viewpoint of applied welfare economics, evaluation of preventive health programs should allow for both process and outcome utility when assessing benefits. In this context, success might be viewed as maximising the opportunity for individuals to make an informed choice.
|