| Titre : | Self-reports of induced abortion : An empathetic setting can improve the quality of data. (2000) |
| Auteurs : | V. RASCH ; S. BERGSTROM ; H. MUHAMMAD ; E. URASSA |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of public health (vol. 90, n° 7, 2000) |
| Pagination : | 1141-1144 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : | IVG ; Qualité ; Epidémiologie ; Méthodologie ; Etude comparée ; Homme ; Femme ; Tanzanie ; Afrique |
| Résumé : | [BDSP. Notice produite par INIST o2R0xTgm. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objectives. This study estimated the proportion of incomplete abortions that are induced in hospital-based settings in Tanzania. Methods. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 2 phases at 3 hospitals in Tanzania. Phase 1 included 302 patients with a diagnosis of incomplete abortion, and phase 2 included 823 such patients. Results. In phase 1, in which cases were classified by clinical criteria and information from the patient, 3.9% to 16.1% of the cases were classified as induced abortion. In phase 2, in which the structured interview was changes to an empathetic dialogue and previously used clinical criteria were omitted, 30.9% to 60.0% of the cases were classified as induced abortion. Conclusions. An empathetic dialogue improves the quality of data collected among women with induced abortion. |

