Titre :
|
Self-reports of induced abortion : An empathetic setting can improve the quality of data. (2000)
|
Auteurs :
|
V. RASCH ;
S. BERGSTROM ;
H. MUHAMMAD ;
E. URASSA
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
American journal of public health (vol. 90, n° 7, 2000)
|
Pagination :
|
1141-1144
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
IVG
;
Qualité
;
Epidémiologie
;
Méthodologie
;
Etude comparée
;
Homme
;
Femme
;
Tanzanie
;
Afrique
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST o2R0xTgm. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objectives. This study estimated the proportion of incomplete abortions that are induced in hospital-based settings in Tanzania. Methods. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 2 phases at 3 hospitals in Tanzania. Phase 1 included 302 patients with a diagnosis of incomplete abortion, and phase 2 included 823 such patients. Results. In phase 1, in which cases were classified by clinical criteria and information from the patient, 3.9% to 16.1% of the cases were classified as induced abortion. In phase 2, in which the structured interview was changes to an empathetic dialogue and previously used clinical criteria were omitted, 30.9% to 60.0% of the cases were classified as induced abortion. Conclusions. An empathetic dialogue improves the quality of data collected among women with induced abortion.
|