Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS AR0xpnGG. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Objective : To determine whether nutrition interventions widen dietary inequalities across socioeconomic status groups. Design : Systematic review of interventions that aim to promote healthy eating. Data sources : CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched between 1990 and 2007. Review methods : Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials or concurrent controlled trials of interventions to promote healthy eating delivered at a group level to low socioeconomic status groups or studies where it was possible to disaggregate data by socioeconomic status. Results : Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Four were set in educational setting (three elementary schools, one vocational training). The first found greater increases in fruit and vegetable consumption in children from high-income families after 1 year (mean difference 2.4 portions per day, p<0.0001) than in children in low-income families (mean difference 1.3 portions per day, p<0.0003). The second did not report effect sizes but reported the nutrition intervention to be less effective in disadvantaged areas (p<0.01). The third found that 24-h fruit juice and vegetable consumption increased more in children born outside the Netherlands ("non-native") after a nutrition intervention (beta coefficient=1.30, p<0.01) than in "native" children (beta coefficient=0.24, p<0.05). The vocational training study found that the group with better educated participants achieved 34% of dietary goals compared with the group who had more non-US born and non-English speakers, which achieved 60% of dietary goals. Two studies were conducted in primary care settings. The first found that, as a result of the intervention, the difference in consumption of added fat between the intervention and the control group was - 8.9 g/day for blacks and - 12.0 g/day for whites (p<0.05). In the second study, there was greater attrition among the ethnic minority participants than among the white participants (p<0.04). Conclusions : Nutrition interventions have differential effects by socioeconomic status, although in this review we found only limited evidence that nutrition interventions widen dietary inequalities. Due to small numbers of included studies, the possibility that nutrition interventions widen inequalities cannot be excluded. This needs to be considered when formulating public health policy. and gender. Importantly, health inequalities persist intergenerationally, affecting the health outcomes of future generations. Policy directed to reducing these inequalities needs to address the evidence that health promotion interventions may be widening health inequalities. For example, there is evidence from health promotion studies that tobacco control interventions, which aim to reduce inequalities, paradoxically further widen health inequalities. With respect to nutrition, there is evidence that people of lower socioeconomic status (SES) tend to eat less fruit and vegetables and fewer foods rich in dietary fibre compared with people in a higher socioeconomic position. In addition, there is a gradient in diet-related diseases by socioeconomic disadvantage. However, whether nutrition interventions increase inequalities has not been studied in detail. The current review aimed to determine whether nutrition interventions widen inequalities by affecting dietary outcomes differentially with respect to SES.
|