A-
A
A+

Service Documentation EHESP

Historique de recherche

Me connecter

PORTAIL DOCUMENTAIRE

École des hautes études en santé publique

Catalogue Multi-bases

Ressources documentaires en ligne

Trouver une revue

Consulter un mémoire

Consulter une thèse

Accueil

Adresse

Service Documentation EHESP
Bibliothèque Rennes Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard – CS 74312 – 35043 Rennes Cedex Bibliothèque MSSH Paris 20 avenue George Sand - 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis

France
Bibliothèque Rennes : 02 99 02 29 50 Bibliothèque MSSH Paris : 02 99 02 24 50
contact

Nouvelle recherche

Creating capacity : a research agenda for public health education. Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research.

Ajouter à ma sélection

Ajouter à ma sélection

Lien vers la notice

Titre :	Creating capacity : a research agenda for public health education. Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research. (1995)
Auteurs :	P. DOLAN MULLEN ; Noreen-M CLARK, éd. ; D. EVANS ; J. FORSTER ; N.H. GOTTLIEB ; M. KREUTER ; Kenneth-R MCLEROY ; R. MOON ; T. O'ROURKE ; V.J. STRECHER ; Univ texas. School public health. Houston TX. USA
Type de document :	Article
Dans :	Health education quarterly (vol. 22, n° 3, 1995)
Pagination :	329-345
Langues:	Anglais
Mots-clés :	Education santé ; Programme santé ; Recherche appliquée ; Evaluation ; Recommandation ; Lieu travail ; Communauté ; Centre santé ; Homme
Résumé :	[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST MXLd5R0x. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. Settings-community, worksite, schools, and healthcare sites-constitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.