Titre :
|
Assessing Network Scale-up Estimates for Groups Most at Risk of HIV/AIDS : Evidence From a Multiple-Method Study of Heavy Drug Users in Curitiba, Brazil. (2011)
|
Auteurs :
|
SALGANIK (Matthew-J) : USA. Department of Sociology and Office of Population Research. Princeton University. Princeton. NJ. ;
Alexandre-H Abdo ;
Francisco-I BASTOS ;
Neilane BERTONI ;
FAZITO (Dimitri) : BRA. Cedeplar. Federal University of Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. ;
Maeve-B MELLO ;
Fiocruz. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Rio de Janeiro. BRA
|
Type de document :
|
Article
|
Dans :
|
American journal of epidemiology (vol. 174, n° 10, 2011)
|
Pagination :
|
1190-1196
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Mots-clés :
|
Toxicomanie
;
Evaluation
;
Relation sociale
;
Estimation
;
Facteur risque
;
Risque
;
Sida
;
Méthode
;
Méthodologie
;
Toxicomane
;
Homme
;
Brésil
;
Epidémiologie
;
VIH
;
Prélèvement
;
Population
;
Virose
;
Infection
;
Amérique
;
Rétrovirus
;
Virus
;
Immunopathologie
;
Amérique du Sud
|
Résumé :
|
[BDSP. Notice produite par INIST-CNRS R0xABsFl. Diffusion soumise à autorisation]. One of the many challenges hindering the global response to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic is the difficulty of collecting reliable information about the populations most at risk for the disease. Thus, the authors empirically assessed a promising new method for estimating the sizes of most at-risk populations : the network scale-up method. Using 4 different data sources, 2 of which were from other researchers, the authors produced 5 estimates of the number of heavy drug users in Curitiba, Brazil. The authors found that the network scale-up and generalized network scale-up estimators produced estimates 5-10 times higher than estimates made using standard methods (the multiplier method and the direct estimation method using data from 2004 and 2010). Given that equally plausible methods produced such a wide range of results, the authors recommend that additional studies be undertaken to compare estimates based on the scale-up method with those made using other methods. If scale-up-based methods routinely produce higher estimates, this would suggest that scale-up-based methods are inappropriate for populations most at risk of HIV/AIDS or that standard methods may tend to underestimate the sizes of these populations.
|